|

Dr.
Buchwald testimony before the Quebec College of Physicians
Medical Board:
Dr.
Gerhard Buchwald takes the stand
A physician from Germany, Dr. Buchwald testifies through an
interpreter. Dr. Lanctot tables his credentials as well as
a copy of his book entitled "Vaccination: Business Based on
Fear". He is recognized as an expert on vaccination by the
Committee.
Dr. Buchwald testifies that his experience includes being
a medical counselor to an association of parents whose children
have been injured or killed by vaccinations. He adds that
he is aware of a thousand vaccination related injury cases
and has had personal contact with 350 cases. In 150 of these
cases, he wrote the medical opinion and acted as an advisor
during the legal proceedings.
Dr Lanctot (L).: If you take this stand in your country, have
you been reprimanded by the medical authorities?
B.: I wrote a paper entitled, "Vaccinations: A Crime Against
our Children". I received written reprimands from the College
of Physicians... In Germany, we have a law called "Kronegesetz"
in the Civil Code, which stipulates that everyone has the
right to freely voice his or her opinion. When I was fed up
with this nonsense with the College, I drew their attention
to the fact that their responses were actually a breach of
those sections of the law. German judges, who deal with these
issues, are very touchy on this issue... It is impossible
to suppress the free speech of a physician in a free country
which is why the College knew that it would lose. They also
knew that the press would really have a field day. Since then
I’ve heard nothing more...
L.: You mentioned earlier that the first criterion in medicine
is to do no harm... And you referred to these ethics in
He continues with a brief history of his experiences in general
and describes how he got interested in the whole question
of immunization. He recalls that after graduating from medical
school, he was a supporter of vaccination policies, as was
everyone else he knew. Then he relates to the Committee the
story of the eldest of his three children, born in 1957, who
at eighteen months received a smallpox vaccination and who,
eight days later was no longer able to stand up in his crib.
Until then, his son’s development had been absolutely normal:
"He fell sick with a post-vaccination encephalitis, and ever
since, I have a completely destroyed human being at home."
It was at that time that someone approached him to become
a member of a protective association in Germany. It was through
this group that he got to know other vaccination damage cases.
"Back then, I was working in one of the oldest lung illness
treatment centers in Germany, and just by chance, I looked
at the files of those people who had fallen ill during the
first German epidemic of smallpox, in 1947. Up to 1974, starting
after the WW II, we had eleven smallpox epidemic events in
Germany. We had always been told that the smallpox vaccination
would protect against smallpox. And now, I could verify, thanks
to the files and papers, that all of those who had fallen
ill had been vaccinated. This was very upsetting for me..."
Dr. Buchwald draws the Committee’s attention to a series of
about 50 graphs in his book which show that vaccinations have
no effect on the decline of infectious diseases.
L.: If vaccines didn’t have any effect on the decline of infectious
diseases, what then caused this decline?
B.: A British professor of social medicine, Thomas McKeown,
showed that the decline in infectious diseases in developed
countries had nothing to do with vaccinations, but with the
decline in poverty and hunger....
L.: Why do you refer to vaccination as a business?
B.: You know, one vaccine against smallpox costs about 600
DM, and the proclaimed target or goal is to vaccinate three
billion people in this world. So if this is not business...
The vaccination against hepatitis costs 250 DM and you need
three of them... Vaccination is a huge business for the pharmaceutical
industry.
L: If you take this stand in your country, have you been reprimanded
by the medical authorities?
B.: I wrote a paper entitled, "Vaccinations: A Crime Against
our Children". I received written reprimands from the College
of Physicians... In Germany, we have a law called "Kronegesetz"
in the Civil Code, which stipulates that everyone has the
right to freely voice his or her opinion. When I was fed up
with this nonsense with the College, I drew their attention
to the fact that their responses were actually a breach of
those sections of the law. German judges, who deal with these
issues, are very touchy on this issue... It is impossible
to suppress the free speech of a physician in a free country,
which is why the College knew that it would lose. They also
knew that the press would really have a field day. Since then
I’ve heard nothing more...
L: You mentioned earlier that the first criterion in medicine
is to do no harm... And you referred to these ethics in your
book: do no harm,
your book: do no harm, be helpful, the well-being of the patient
is the supreme rule, the will of the patient is the supreme
rule... Does vaccination respond to those rules?
B. No, and I cannot understand it. Those rules are always
being stressed by our physicians and by the medical community
except when it comes to vaccination...
L.: Are vaccination campaigns waged out of fear? Are they
made to scare people?
B.: I have lectured all over the world... I have always had
a special interest in newspapers. All of them have one thing
in common, there is always some reference made to some epidemic
in some part of the world. For instance, two years ago, one
paper referred to a polio epidemic in Holland. For the past
three years, our newspapers have commented on the diphtheria
epidemic in Russia. By these means, the population is constantly
threatened with epidemics, they have been made to fear them,
and the reports always conclude: "Go and get vaccinated".
L.: That’s the sales pitch.
B.: Yes.
After yet another round of objections, Dr. Lanctot asks Dr.
Buchwald about his position on hepatitis B vaccine?
B.: First there was a simple hepatitis infection, then we
were able to distinguish between hepatitis A, B, non-A, non-B,
and today, we call still another hepatitis C. In 1981, we
saw the introduction of vaccinations for all medical personnel.
All the other forms of hepatitis we didn’t vaccinate against
were in decline. But hepatitis B stayed at the same level,
even after the introduction of the vaccine. It was then believed
in Germany that we made a mistake, it’s not being passed through
the blood but by sexual contact. We expected the response
to be to vaccinate everyone where the event of sexual intercourse
would be a factor... However, the response was to vaccinate
everyone. And this is where you can see that it all revolves
around money.
L.: What is your position regarding measles vaccination?
B.: Once again I have a graph... As of 1962... there was a
decline in cases of measles and deaths due to measles,
there were virtually no deaths... In 1976. vaccinations began...
there were about ten deaths related to measles. It stayed
like that for years, until it finally declined even further.
Now, you can count the number of deaths on one hand... Vaccinating
against measles is not just useless, but harmful. In the past,
infants would not get measles. They would get the protection
through their mothers, who used to have measles themselves.
Mothers who were vaccinated against measles cannot pass on
the protection to their infants, so infants now get measles.
L.: Because mothers have been vaccinated against measles as
children they now cannot pass on the protection, but if they
have not been vaccinated they can?
B.: Exactly... Our grandparents knew exactly how important
it was for kids to go through measles. My grandmother, for
instance, would have said: "This boy is six ears old. He is
going to be in school pretty soon and he has not had the measles
yet." He would be sent to visit a child with measles in order
to catch it. I got measles...
L.: Does the protection conferred by the disease protect for
life?
B.: It’s deemed to, and I think so too.
L.: Why do we have to repeat measles vaccination then?
B.: Because it’s an opportunity to make money.
L.: What’s your position about MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella),
the three vaccines given together?
B.: Maybe I could give you one example from Switzerland...
There is a large group of physicians, pediatricians, and experts
on children’s diseases. They are opposed to the vaccination
campaign against measles, which according to the World Health
Organization (WHO), was to include all Swiss children... It
has not been decided to go ahead, yet... But this is not what
lies at the heart of the whole issue.., it’s a question of
money.
L.: How can you say it is for money?
B.: Who’s paying the WHO? Where do they get their funds? What
are the links from the WHO to all the huge pharmaceutical
Companies? Just look at that. We physicians are the modern
slaves of the pharmaceutical industry... We depend on their
pre-fabricated medications... They are the real overlords...
Dr. Lanctot again has to respond to a series of objections
arguing that what Dr. Buchwald was saying was identical to
what appeared in her book, and for which she was brought up
before this Disciplinary Committee: "We are at least two people
in the world saying the same thing. There may be others. It’s
the WHO which makes the decisions to vaccinate in our countries.
Your child may be vaccinated tomorrow, and it won’t be your
decision, nor your doctor’s, nor your government’s, but that
of the WHO. That’s what he’s saying."
But the exchange doesn’t end there. She notes that Dr. Buchwald’s
testimony is pertinent given the fact she had referred to
the medical establishment and WHO in her book:
see the dangers because they’re obvious. We heard this morning
that Merck organized a scientific meeting which they financed,
but they didn’t invite Dr. Hyde because he says there are
problems. However, others were invited and then the government
puts out a bulletin stating that everything is all right...
What more will it take before we begin to ask ourselves how
such things happen?"
As the arguing drags on, a frustrated Dr. Lanctot makes the
following proposal: "I will make a deal with you. Tell me
that medicine is dogmatic, that it is a sect, with no room
for thinking, which has to be blindly obeyed, and I’ll tender
my resignation - here and now. Tell me and it’s all over!"
But no one does. And so the bickering continues between the
now infamous three protagonists. When the dust again settles,
Dr. Lanctot resumes her questioning.
L.: You mentioned that a group of Swiss physicians have banded
together to oppose the WHO-imposed mandatory vaccination plan.
Can you tell us what their arguments are?
B.:They are afraid that the dangers far outweigh the benefits...
The Swiss physicians are concerned about what has occurred
in the United States. There is a report that deaths have risen
ten-fold (since the introduction of mandatory vaccinations)
and that this situation has mystified American physicians.
B.: The cause of tetanus is a bacillus and the vaccine against
it is one of the few vaccines that contains neither virus
nor bacilli... What has been hidden away is the fact that
it is possible to treat tetanus...
L.: It’s not necessary, but is it harmful?
B.: Guillain-Barre Syndrome carried by tetanus is one of the
worst side-effects known. You may be paralyzed, beginning
from the neck down, and this can last a whole year. We know
that a muscle that is not used atrophies. What is lost of
this muscle over that year is lost forever. In Germany, the
head of vaccination services issued a number of opinions,
but did not publish these in medical journals in order not
to discredit vaccination as a whole. Physicians who vaccinate
withhold certain medical information, proven medical knowledge,
to the detriment of patients and the population at large.
Wounds that bleed will never result in tetanus because the
tetanus bacillus is anaerobic. It is absolutely silly to vaccinate
boys who cut their knees. The only reason behind that is money.
L.: I would like to know your position on DPT shots.
B.: I was showing you the graph on diphtheria. It shows that
vaccinations have no influence. That (on the graph) was where
the vaccination was introduced, but despite that, there was
an increase... In 1925 there was a vaccination campaign. We
then had about 20,000 cases. During WW II, the number rose
to 250,000 cases and then dropped significantly, even though
during the War and during the post-War period, shortly thereafter,
no vaccinations were carried out at all...
"The same situation for tuberculosis," Dr. Buchwald continues,
"Every year, there was a decline in cases of tuberculosis
in Germany. To such an extent, that there were less and less
dangers from this disease. After the War we had 160,000 cases
and 40,000 deaths, meaning that one out of four people with
the illness died. In 1994, we had 13,000 cases with 1,000
deaths. This means one out of 13 died. You can see how this
illness has come to be less and less dangerous over time.
One hundred years ago, being diagnosed with tuberculosis was
a death sentence. You can see (on his graph) that vaccinations
had no influence at all.
The reason behind this decline is as I showed you earlier.
Never before have both Germans and Canadians, for instance,
enjoyed such a good life. The victory that has been won over
epidemics is not due to physicians, but to farmers and social
legislation... Better dwellings, better bathrooms, and more
soap... Everything that we may refer to as general social
ameliorations... As a small boy, three of us kids shared the
same bed... Our general living conditions are responsible
for our good health. This isn’t due to vaccinations at all,
that’s just for the money."
DAY 9— MARCH 26, 1996
Dr. Buchwald’s testimony continues...
The day begins innocently enough, but will end with a bang
when Dr. Lanctot takes issue with the President’s constant
barrage of objections regarding the relevance of her questions
and evidence. As during the previous days of hearings, most
objections originate from the President, Mr. Prevost having
from all appearances abdicated from this role. The President’s
insistence this day will finally bring about a cry of foul
from Dr. Lanctot when he holds up the testimony of another
one of her witnesses, Dr. Martin, a recognized expert in the
field of vaccines.
But first, Dr. Lanctot resumes her questioning of Dr. Buchwald
on the subject of polio vaccinations.
Dr. Buchwald responds that prior to the introduction of polio
vaccinations in Germany, anyone was counted as having polio,
even if they only had the virus in their feces. It is known,
he goes on, that there are people who are healthy but who
evacuate polio viruses when they go to the bathroom. Based
on this criteria, the number of cases was approximately 4,000
per year. After the introduction of the vaccine, statistics
included only those polio cases of people who were paralyzed
for at least six weeks.
L.: If I understand you correctly, before, everyone was counted,
those with polio in their feces as well as those sick with
polio, and that totaled 4,000. When they started the polio
vaccination, they only counted those people who had been paralyzed
for at least six weeks, is this right?
B.: Yes.
L.: So, this is how statistics improved from 4,000 to 400?
B.: Yes, exactly...
L.: Okay, that’s what I understood. When you say they changed
the way the calculations were done, who were "they"? Was this
a medical or a political decision?
B.: It is always the same group that decides... the World
Health Organization (WHO).
L.: It always ends up at the WHO…..What is your opinion of
polio vaccinations?
B.:Since 1978, there hasn’t been a single case of polio in
Germany, but every year there are about 50 cases of paralysis
caused by the vaccine. The German authorities... have indicated
that they would have to reconsider their policy because it’s
not logical to carry out a vaccination campaign which causes
50 people to become paralyzed when the illness itself hasn’t
created a single case (of polio) in 20 years.
On the subject of flu vaccine, Dr. Buchwald notes: "There
is no such thing as a flu vaccine. We have to distinguish
between, on one side, a cold-like symptom for which there
is no vaccination... The vaccine will only protect against
influenza, but because it sounds good in terms of advertising,
they still stick to the term "flu" in German because nobody
would take any vaccine if it were called influenza vaccination."
Dr Lanctot the broaches the subject of meningitis, which Dr.
Buchwald indicates, is not a problem in Germany. His answer
so surprises one Committee member that he interrupts Dr. Buchwald
and asks incredulously whether he meant that there were no
cases of the disease or no vaccine. Dr. Buchwald’s replies
that one form of the disease didn’t exist anymore, and that
there is no vaccine for the other.
Dr. Lanctot then asks Dr. Buchwald to identify the sources
he used to develop his charts. He tells her that under German
law every case of an infectious disease has to be registered
with the health services and these national statistics are
accessible to everyone. As well, they are published in a number
of journals: "Anyone can go and verify that this data is correct."
L: Are all vaccine damages or adverse effects reported?
B. No. The law prescribes the criteria according to which
vaccine damage cases have to be reported. The fact that there
such cases is not mentioned in Germany. Even physicians don’t
know about it...
L. Who knows?
B:By word of mouth, and more recently because of the work
of associations for persons damaged by vaccinations. For instance,
there was one televised program concerning this topic that
included a reference to my book. After the program, a number
of physicians called the association in tears asking if the
reported vaccine-caused damage cases were really true... Since
I have the permission to give out the addresses of those children
who are affected, that’s what I did, so that they could ask
them directly. It was such a terrible revelation that the
physicians simply didn’t want to believe it... damage caused
by vaccinations means the complete destruction of a child,
of an individual. Those kids can’t speak. They’re complete
idiots, imbeciles. Often, they are spastically paralyzed,
and frequently, they also suffer from muscular cramps... Sometimes
whole families are destroyed...
L.: How is it that physicians are not aware of that? They
see those children? Let’s say I’m a physician. If I inject
one of my patients. I’m going to be aware of the complications.
Where’s the problem?
B.: As I said earlier, a physician may only know that which
he or she has learned... I will add, in their defense, they
simply don’t know any better. They get their information from
a book that says vaccinations are fine.
L.: How is it that you know?
B.: Because I delved into the subject. One major reason, of
course, was my son’s history, which I described earlier.
L.: If your son had not been a victim of a vaccination, would
you have become aware of this whole situation?
B.: No. After my final exams, I was a supporter of vaccinations,
and I would be to this day...
L.: Those parent associations you have talked about, this
association you went to when your child got sick, are they
religious or esoteric associations?
B.: Not at all.
To yet another objection to her line of questioning by the
President, Dr. Lancot retorts: "Dr. Buchwald is reporting
exactly the same thing as did Dr. Hyde yesterday. It is relevant.
Patients so affected are not heard. Everyone refuses to listen
to them... Patients are sick as dogs, but nobody listens.
Physicians are scared... Why is this not reported? Why is
this hidden? Yesterday Dr. Hyde spoke of more than 100 such
patients dying from hepatitis B vaccine... But there is no
one to listen. What do we do?"
P.:This is not the appropriate forum to treat...
L.:When will it be an appropriate forum?
P. Surely not before us.
L.:So what are we doing here? What are we all doing here?
P.: I will tell you. We have a complaint before us, that’s
what concerns us. Therefore, I will ask you to come back to
the matter before us.
L. What I did (referring to the complaint) was to say exactly
what these people have been saying...
Asked whether she had any other questions, as a way to get
back to what the President considered to be the matter at
hand, she asks Dr. Buchwald what he fears most from vaccinations.
"It’s a complicated question. The Austrian physician Aschner
said the history of medicine is one of continuous errors...
In 1901 a German physician by the name of Emil Behring made
horses artificially fall ill with diphtheria. Ninety per cent
of them died, the rest survived. He extracted their blood..,
waited for it to settle and then used what had settled to
the top to vaccinate children who had contracted diphtheria.
Today,, he would be sued for cruelty to animals, but in 1901,
he received the Nobel prize... Streets are named after him...
Many of the children vaccinated back then died... If the children
needed to be vaccinated again, a different animal was used.
They took cows, goats, pigs, but the children still died...
We encounter the same problems with blood transfusions. As
the number of operations rose, blood was needed and so animal
blood was used. But patients died. It was only later that
we learned that (such blood) contained a foreign protein...
We then learned that we could only take human blood. Four
different blood groups were identified. Nevertheless, people
died during blood transfusions until we learned that there
were subgroups, but even today, every eighth case of blood
transfusion results in damage. The problem is the foreign
protein that is introduced in the body. Protein is a very
important element. We need it for life. It is transformed
by the liver into basic components, amino acids, but the damage
is done if a foreign protein is introduced without going through
the system... it always results in damage. Every vaccination,
whether bacteria or virus based, implies the introduction
of a foreign protein..."
Dr. Buchwald continues by describing a human being as having
approximately eight billion brain cells> He notes that a bout
with encephalopathy destroys from one to three million of
these cells: "Today, there are about 150 vaccines being worked
on, and within the next decade, we could have a flu vaccine
for the left nostril and one for one right nostril. Mankind
will be used as a pin cushion. For every vaccination, minimal
encephalopathy destroys brain cells. As a result, in Germany,
there are 1.2 million children who have contracted hyperkinetic
syndrome who are then treated with Psychopharmeca (a drug
similar to Ritalin) used to calm them down... We have hundreds
of thousands of so-called minimal cerebral dysfunction cases
and millions of neurodermatitis patients. In Germany, there
are millions of people with allergies. We don’t just produce
minimal encephalopathies in the brain, but we also produce
modifications of the genetic code."
Despite another series of objections to Dr. Buchwald’s "history
lesson", Dr. Lanctot persists and Dr. Buchwald continues...
In 1866, an English physician described a very strange illness.
Children looked like Mongols. His name was Down. That’s why
we call it Down’s Syndrome today... I should add that this
syndrome is a result of the vaccinations carried throughout
England by Jenner in 1796... It (Down’s Syndrome) is probably
the first congenital disease caused by vaccinations. In Germany,
the first child with evidence of Down’s Syndrome was reported
in 1922. Today, one in every 700 newborns has it... But the
most terrifying fact is still to come... We already know today
of 4,000 illnesses caused by genes. Ten years ago, Germany
had 3 million illiterate people. Today, it’s 4 million. America
has three times the population, about 240 million, meaning
they should have about 12 million illiterate people..."
The "history lesson" is again interrupted, and again Dr. Lanctot
is not at a loss for words. She takes issue with the President,
and, as has by now become a tradition at these hearings, engages
him in a long exchange defending the relevance of Dr. Buchwald’s
testimony and outlining her frustration with his constant
interventions.
L.:Illiteracy is the direct result of vaccinations, that’s
what (Dr. Buchwald) is telling us... We don’t understand it,
and he’s here explaining it to us... With each vaccination,
we create an encephalopathy which reduces the mental capacities
of our children... which in turn explains the rise in illiteracy...
P.: We have to get back to the complaint at hand. The rest
may be a nice subject for a conference elsewhere.
L.: If it’s not at here at the College, we have to change
its vocation and stop this, and get back to protecting the
public.
P.: Go to the College; here we’re with the Disciplinary Committee.
L.: Let’s not play at cat and mouse... I’m here because the
College says it protects the public, and there are people
who have come here to show us that’s not so...
P.: Now, listen, I’m telling you that what this witness is
telling us is not relevant to the case. If he can’t keep his
answer short, go to another question!
L.: The story of the mouse tails which keeps coming back...
He’s telling us that vaccines to cause genetic changes and
congenital deformities.
P.: If you have any other questions...
Dr. Lanctot asks Dr. Buchwald to continue with his description
of the deformities related to vaccinations, despite the President’s
"two minute" warning,
"Scientists from the University of Mainz, were startled to
discover that 34% of German first graders tested were found
to have speech impediments... What I wanted to show by that
is that, slowly but surely, vaccines work to destroy the intelligence
of future generations... What can you do with a population
where the young generation cannot count to three? You might
have heard about the Mormons or the Jehovah Witnesses, who
believe the world will come to an end, that Jesus Christ will
come down from heaven and everyone will be destroyed. Only
they would be spared. That’s probably the way it’s going to
be, however, not exactly the way they think. They’ll probably
survive because they’re opposed to vaccines. I’m very, very
troubled and concerned about the future of my country..."
On that note Dr. Buchwald’s testimony ends.
Dr Lanctot’s comments
Gerhard Buchwald knows that the medical and government systems
are based on money and controlled by the WHO. The authorities
hide the truth about the link between illnesses and vaccines.
He knows and is not afraid to say it out loud. He knows all
about vaccines. He has the data, the details. An encyclopedia
of facts. He describes how every vaccine shot causes cerebral
damage which goes un-noticed until it manifests itself in
hyper-activity, and learning, behavioral disorders, as well
as social violence. That is why illiteracy is on the rise
despite the schooling of our populations: 4 million illiterate
people in Germany and 27 million in the U.S.
The list of consequences resulting from vaccines is long:
children with allergies, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, sudden
infant death syndrome... He describes the devastation to families
who have to deal with a handicapped child: the separations
and social costs. At this point I break out in tears. The
terrible stories which victims of vaccinations have told me
come to mind. I let the tears flow.., then I continue my questioning.
I’m not the only one affected. The interpreter gets out his
handkerchief on a number of occasions. The audience is silent.
Only the Committee is stoic in their indifference. The members
are waiting for it to end. They treat him with a certain disdain.
They are not able to refuse his testimony, after all he is
a physician, but also a foreigner. It’s of no matter to them.
They don’t believe him, and anyway, their mind was already
made up before he even uttered a word.
Reproduced with permission of Here’s The Key Inc, CP309, Waterloo,
Qc JOE 2NO, Canada. Tel: 001 450 297 2533. Fax: 001 450 297
4140
Selected extracts taken from The Trial of the Medical Mafia
by Jochim Schafer ISBN 2921783029.
To reach Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. Tel: 001 514 297 4128. Fax:
001 514 297 4140
|