|

Survey:
Many med schools let sponsors control research
The
Associated Press
At
least half of U.S. medical schools are willing to give companies
that sponsor studies of drugs and treatments considerable
control over the results, says a survey that some doctors
found troubling.
Half
of the schools said they would let pharmaceutical companies
and makers of medical devices draft articles that appear in
medical journals, and a quarter would allow them to supply
the actual results. But academics draw the line at gag orders
that keep researchers from publishing negative findings.
"This is totally beyond reasonable practice. What you're seeing
here is a willingness by some institutions to give more leeway
than they should," says Harlan Krumholz, a Yale University
cardiologist and epidemiologist who was not involved in the
survey.
Private industry pays for more than two-thirds of medical
research at U.S. universities, which has led increasingly
to conflict-of-interest suspicions. Two decades ago, the federal
government was the main benefactor.
The study, led by Michelle Mello of the Harvard School of
Public Health, is in today's New England Journal of Medicine.
Harvard sent surveys to the nation's 122 accredited medical
schools to gauge standards between researchers and sponsors.
The medical schools overwhelmingly agreed they would not enter
into contracts that would allow companies to edit research
articles or suppress negative results. But 50% would let companies
draft research papers, and nearly 25% would let them provide
the data.
"These results are really bothersome," says Jerome Kassirer,
former editor in chief of the journal and author of a recent
book about conflict of interest in research. "Some investigators
may be willing to accept constraints just to maintain good
relations with the company." Kassirer had no role in the survey.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America,
a trade group, says corporate sponsors do not interfere with
researchers' independence.
The group publishes voluntary guidelines stating that companies
will sometimes help analyze and interpret results and have
the right to review articles before publication. The guidelines
also note that sponsors own the data.
Recent controversies involving companies accused of suppressing
unfavorable results have led to demands for more public disclosure
of industry-sponsored research. Drug manufacturers GlaxoSmithKline
and Merck recently were accused of hiding information about
the antidepressant Paxil and the painkiller Vioxx, respectively.
Back
to 'Dangerous Medications' Page
|