|

Seniors,
Side Effects, and Celebrex: Does This Strong, One-Size-Fits-All
Drug Put Seniors, Women, And Others At Unnecessary Risk?
How
Medication Marketing Overrides Medical Science.
Celebrex, the powerful, top-selling anti-inflammatory drug,
symbolizes the good and bad of medication therapy today. On
the one hand, Celebrex helps millions of people. On the other,
it's one-size-fits-all dosage for degenerative arthritis (osteoarthritis)
is unnecessarily strong for many people, placing them at extra
risk of major side effects such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage,
kidney injury, and death.
The risks aren't small. Anti-inflammatory drugs cause more
than 16,000 deaths and 100,000 hospitalizations each year.
The Physicians' Desk Reference states: "Serious gastrointestinal
toxicity such as bleeding, ulceration, and perforation, can
occur at any time, with or without warning symptoms, in patients
treated chronically with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(1)." Yet, as the New England Journal of Medicine warned:
"These toxic effects remain largely a `silent epidemic,' with
many physicians and most patients unaware of the magnitude
of the problem (2)." The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
is somewhat less with newer anti-inflammatory drugs like Celebrex,
but the risk of kidney failure isn't (2A), and the newer drugs
have also been associated with cardiovascular events (2B).
Seniors and Women, Beware!
Seniors (and women) are impacted the most. Why? One major
reason is that although seniors are more vulnerable to the
toxic effects of anti-inflammatory drugs, they routinely receive
the same strong doses as younger, bigger, healthier people.
Such methods defy medical sense and common sense, yet the
same 100-mg twice-daily dose of Celebrex is indicated for
Shaquille O'Neal's arthritic toe, Ally McBeal's tennis elbow
arthritis, and Grandma Moses' arthritic fingers, even if Grandma
is 90 years old, weighs 90 pounds, and takes nine other drugs.
Medication side effects are a huge problem for seniors, most
of whom rely on prescription drugs. Overall, seniors account
for about 20% of the population, yet they sustain 39% of drug
side effects requiring hospitalization and 51% causing death
(3,4). That's why experts repeatedly advise doctors to use
caution when treating seniors and, except in acute situations,
to start with the lowest, safest medication doses. In my book
Over Dose (5), I quote experts, medical journals and textbooks
on this point, but here one statement will suffice, because
it's from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration:
"There is evidence that older adults tend to be more sensitive
to drugs than younger adults, due to their generally slower
metabolisms and organ functions. ... The old adage, `Start
low and go slow,' applies especially to the elderly (FDA Consumer
Magazine, 1997)(6)."
You need to go no farther than Celebrex, an arthritis drug
commonly prescribed for seniors. The 1999 Celebrex package
insert states that "the incidence of adverse experiences tended
to be higher in elderly patients (7)." The 2003 package insert
states that "there have been more spontaneous post-marketing
reports of fatal gastrointestinal events and acute renal failure"
with Celebrex in seniors (8).
Here's another reason why seniors should take lower doses
of Celebrex: blood levels of Celebrex rise higher in seniors,
40%-50% higher on average than in younger adults (8). Higher
blood levels mean greater risks. Seniors don't need higher
blood levels of Celebrex for it to work. With a lower dose,
they could get the same blood levels and effectiveness as
younger adults. This is important because seniors are more
vulnerable than younger adults to the serious side effects
of anti-inflammatory drugs.
Women are also impacted by these issues. Celebrex blood levels
rise higher in older women than older men, which the manufacturer
attributes to women's lower weight. Thus, the package inserts
recommends that "for patients of less than 50 kg [110 pounds]
in body weight, initiate therapy at the lowest recommended
dose (8)."
That's a good idea, but for osteoarthritis, the recommended
dose is one-size-fits-all. There is no lower dose.
The Devil Is in the Dosage
Why is it so important to use the lowest effective doses of
medications? Because 75%-80% of all side effects are dose-related
(9,10). Just like with coffee and alcohol, most side effects
are a function of the amounts taken, not of the drugs themselves.
Lower medication doses usually have fewer risks and are sometimes
surprisingly effective. In fact, many seniors with arthritis
do fine with the very low doses in the over-the-counter anti-inflammatories
Aleve, Orudis, or Motrin (ibuprofen).
So what is my concern about Celebrex? The Celebrex package
insert advises, "For osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis,
the lowest dose of Celebrex should be sought for each patient
(8)." But how can you do this if the dosage is one-size-fits-all?
Lower doses of Celebrex actually work (11,12), but because
they aren't marketed, most doctors and patients don't know
this. For example, in a large Mayo Clinic study, 50 mg twice-daily
of Celebrex was significantly effective (11). That's 50% less
medication than the standard dose -- and considerably less
risk.
Most of the people in this study had severe arthritis. This
suggests that an even lower Celebrex dosage, 25 mg perhaps,
would be enough for people with mild arthritis. In fact, in
a decade or so we'll probably see low-dose Celebrex as an
over-the-counter drug. That's exactly what happened with Motrin,
Orudis, and Aleve (naproxen). But why must we wait a decade
to obtain the lowest, safest, effective anti-inflammatory
doses? That's exactly what I asked in my 2003 article in the
Annals of Pharmacotherapy: "Why Aren't Lower, Effective, Over-The-Counter
Doses Available Earlier by Prescription (13)?"
One-Size-Fits-All: A Worsening Trend
Anti-inflammatory drugs introduced in the 1970s and 1980s
came in multiple sizes. Motrin came in 300, 400, 600, and
800 mg sizes. Naproxen: 250, 375, and 500 mg. Naproxen 250
mg twice-daily worked for most of my patients. Naproxen 375
mg twice-daily was enough for most of the rest. Only a small
percentage required the 500 mg twice-daily dosage.
Studies show that Celebrex is as effective as naproxen. In
fact, it's as effective as the 500 mg dose of naproxen (11).
So Celebrex is very powerful. The problem is, all patients
are started with this powerful dose, the equivalent of the
strongest, riskiest dose of naproxen. You don't get the choice
of starting Celebrex at a dose that's equivalent to 250 or
375 mg of naproxen. Therein lies the problem, because these
drugs' worst toxicities are dose-related, and even the FDA
urges doctors to prescribe the lowest, safest, effective doses.
Marketing over Medical Science
Why is this happening? That's discussed at length in Over
Dose, but in short, drug companies market to doctors, who
prefer drugs that are easy to prescribe, allowing them to
finish quickly and move on. Meanwhile, doctors assume that
if a drug is recommended one-size-fits-all, it's okay, because
the drug companies have researched it and the FDA has approved
it. This assumption is dead wrong. The system has no direction,
regulation is weak, and marketing factors frequently override
medical science.
Such methods may work with other, less vital commodities,
but with medications it has a distinct downside: more than
106,000 deaths and 2,000,000 severe, often disabling side
effects in U.S. hospitals annually (9). If outpatients were
included, the numbers would be even higher. Moreover, side
effects drive millions of people from badly needed treatment
every year.
Informed Consent Means Possessing Enough Information to Make
an Intelligent Choice
Medications, including Celebrex, help millions of people.
But medications are also a leading cause of death and disability.
Much of this harm is preventable by using the lowest effective
doses that each person requires.
Lower doses don't work for everyone. Some people require standard
doses. Some people require high doses. But many people respond
to lower, safer doses if given the chance. And in my experience,
most people would prefer to at least start with a lower dose;
if it isn't effective, the dosage can always be raised. This
is what I call precision prescribing. This model doesn't apply
to some drugs (e.g., some anti-infectives and anti-cancer
drugs), but it applies to most drugs.
However, you and your doctor can't consider a lower, safer
dose of Celebrex if you don't know about it. And you won't
learn about it in the package insert or Physicians' Desk Reference,
which are written by the drug companies. My purpose in publishing
Over Dose and this newsletter is to provide scientifically-sound
information about lower, safer doses of scores of top-selling
drugs, information you won't get from package inserts, the
PDR, or the drug industry's saturation advertising or 90,000
sales reps. Newspaper and magazine articles sometimes provide
good information, but often read more like infomercials.
Most people don't like taking medications. If they must, they
prefer taking as little medication as possible. But unless
the healthcare system makes this possible, we will continue
over-dosing millions of people and perpetuating the decades-long
epidemic of side effects. Prevention begins with good information.
If you and your doctor want to try low-dose Celebrex (do not
alter doses yourself), you cannot split the 100-mg capsule.
You and your doctor could consider using Celebrex once-daily
instead of twice-daily, but the effects might not last twenty-four
hours.
Another approach is to have a compounding pharmacy make lower
dose capsules. For a fee, many compounding pharmacies will
do this with a doctor's order. If you or your doctor don't
have a local compounding pharmacy, the Professional Compounding
Centers of America (800-331-2498; 281-933-6948) will help
you find one.
References
1.
Physicians' Desk Reference, 53th Edition. Montvale, N.J.:
Medical Economics Company, 1999. 2. Wolfe, MM, Lichtenstein,
DR, Singh, G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 1999;1340(24):1888-99.
2A. Ahmad, SR, Kortepeter, C, Brinker, A, et al. Renal failure
associated with the use of celecoxib and rofecoxib. Drug Safety
2002;25:537-544. 2B. Bing, RJ. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors:
is there an association with coronary or renal events? Current
Atherosclerosis Reports 2003;5:114-7. 3. Smucker, WD, Kontak,
JR. Adverse drug reactions causing hospital admission in an
elderly population: experience with a decision algorithm.
Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 1990;3(2):105-9.
3A. Montamat, SC, Cusack, BJ, Vestal, RE. Management of drug
therapy in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine 1989;321(5):303-9.
4. Recchia, AG, Shear, NH. Organization And Function Of An
Adverse Drug Reaction Clinic. Journal Of Clinical Psychiatry,
1994;34:68-79. 5. Cohen, JS. Over Dose: The Case Against The
Drug Companies. Prescription Drugs, Side Effects, and Your
Health. Tarcher/Putnam, New York: October 2001. 6. Williams,
RD. Medications and older adults. FDA Consumer Magazine, Sept.-Oct.
1997. 7. Celebrex Package Insert. Searle & Co., 1999. 8. Physicians'
Desk Reference, 57th Edition. Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics
Company, 2003. 9. Lazarou, J, Pomeranz, BH, Corey, PN. Incidence
of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis
of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279(15):1200-5. 10. Melmon,
KL, Morrelli, HF, Hoffman, BB, Nierenberg, DW. Melmon and
Morrelli's Clinical Pharmacology: Basic Principles in Therapeutics.
(3rd Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993. 11. Bensen
WG, Fiechtner JJ, McMillen JI, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis
with celecoxib: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clinic
Proceedings 1999;74(11):1095-105. 12. Hubbard, R, Geis, GS,
Woods, E, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of celecoxib,
a specific Cox-2 inhibitor, in osteoarthritis. Arthritis and
Rheumatism, 1998;41(9 suppl):S196[abstract]. 13. Cohen, JS.
Why Aren't Lower, Effective, OTC Doses Available Earlier by
Prescription? Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37(1):136-142.
Back
to 'Dangerous Medications' Page
|